In the previous two posts of this series, I discussed the past, present, and future of the internet mailing list--along with the other new technologies jostling for position in the fray. In this final post of the series, I want to address the role of the blog in scientific discourse. What does it bring to the table? What are its drawbacks?
The Blog
As a case study, let's consider the case of Ida (more properly known as Darwinius masillae). This little primate, announced in the open access publication PLoS ONE and accompanied by a media juggernaut of unprecedented proportions, grabbed the world's attention (including mine). Every corner of the Internet, from the mailing lists to the blogs to the news sites to the home page of Google, was buzzing.
From the nearly the start, people picked up on something unsatisfactory with the story. Whether it was the hype, the conclusions of the paper, or the validity of the name, nearly everyone had an opinion. Within minutes, wonderfully cogent critiques were presented - largely in the blogosphere (see Brian Switek's blog carnival at Laelaps for the cream of the crop). Sure, there was some back-and-forth on VRTPALEO and various other mailing lists, and certainly some (often snide) comments on the social networks, but the blogs were where the real action was!
As a prime example, let's look at the problem of the validity of the name "Darwinius". By the standards of the bean counters at the ICZN, it wasn't valid as originally published! A commenter (among others throughout the Internet) at Carl Zimmer's The Loom really brought the issue front and center, resulting in extensive discussion by a number of professional paleontologists, and two widely read follow-up posts. Perhaps in part due to this widespread exposure, the issue was very, very quickly resolved. Again--some of the mailing lists were discussing this, but the "good stuff" was in the blogosphere.
What is it about blogs that contribute to this phenomenon? To start superficially, blogs are attractive. With just an internet connection and a laptop, pretty much anyone can create a profesionally-appearing, attractive layout with relevant graphics and links. The plain-text mailing lists just don't allow this.
Next, blogs allow a forum for knowledgeable people to speak and be heard. Degreed professionals--such as the guys at SV-POW!--and talented science writers--I'll pick on Brian Switek again as a paleontological example--do a tremendous job of presenting complicated information to the public and professional communities. This sort of commentary and presentation just wouldn't be found at Facebook or a mailing list--it's outside their scopes. Of course, this is a double-edged sword--some bloggers tend towards grandstanding and pandering to the fanbase at the expense of real content. In part, this is a function of the medium--a blog belongs to an individual (or a few individuals), and is in some ways intended to communicate more by decree than by conversation. Whether this is a good thing or not largely depends upon the blog.
This aside, the comment threads are another important part of the blogosphere. As an excellent example, check out the exchange on the recently-published primate Ganlea. Particularly in cases where the threads are of a manageable size, people pay attention. Real discussion is happening there. But, this does tend to fall apart in blogs that are too big. . .
So what is the big difference of a blog's comments from a typical mailing list? The comment threads are more readily accessible to the public - you don't need to access some text-only or subscriber-only archives. The thread of conversation is right there with the conversation starter. And wow, can these comment threads be enlightening!
Can It Last?
I would argue that the real on-line conversation about science has moved to the blogs. But is this sustainable? Only time will tell. Just two years ago, there was only a fraction of the number of blogs we have today. As the medium expands, it is getting tougher and tougher to keep on top of things. I predict that we're going to see more niche blogs developing, too. With so many good "general paleontology" blogs out there, it's going to be more appealing to specialize in topics like the Triassic, or sauropod vertebrae, or aquatic amniotes. We may very well see a fragmentation of the blog audience as a consequence, with a few heavy hitters getting consistent widespread pageviews, and everyone else catering to a more niche audience. Who knows what the future will bring?
Showing posts with label mailing lists. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mailing lists. Show all posts
Wednesday, July 1, 2009
Tuesday, June 16, 2009
The End of the Internet Mailing List? Part II
In my previous post, I outlined the (in my opinion) glory days and slow change (some might even say decline) of email-based lists such as the Dinosaur Mailing List. That post ended with a question - what happened?
What Happened to Mailing Lists?
In short, the Internet matured. 10 or 15 years ago, mailing lists were really the only game in town (aside from a handful of themed chat rooms). If you were a dinosaur fan, you joined the Dinosaur Mailing List. Today, you can choose between the DML, various internet forums, social networks, and blogs. Simultaneously, the user community has exploded. Literally hundreds--and perhaps even thousands--of folks follow, comment, and create paleo content on the web every day. The conversation has not only moved, it has expanded into a variety of niches.
In the rest of this post, and the next post, I'll focus on two technologies in particular: social networking and blogs.
Social Networking and the Paleontologist
Over the past year or two, I have found that I get much of my informal news and gossip from Facebook. In fact, Facebook is the primary method of communication that I have with some colleagues, even above email. Facebook is quick, easy, and allows for real-time chat. Over the past few weeks, I learned nearly immediately who had SVP abstracts accepted and rejected, and often get up-to-the-minute reports of manuscript acceptances, fieldwork successes (and failures), and other details from status postings. At its best, Facebook provides a level of casual (sometimes too casual) interaction with many of my far-flung colleagues on a daily basis - a finger on the pulse of the community. The informal nature of Facebook and similar sites mean that, for now, it probably won't replace mailing lists for announcement of new papers or serious discussion. But, social networking sites certainly offer a fun and informative way to keep in touch with other paleo types.
Thoughts? Alternative Perspectives?
Coming up. . .Blogging and the Paleontological Community
What Happened to Mailing Lists?
In short, the Internet matured. 10 or 15 years ago, mailing lists were really the only game in town (aside from a handful of themed chat rooms). If you were a dinosaur fan, you joined the Dinosaur Mailing List. Today, you can choose between the DML, various internet forums, social networks, and blogs. Simultaneously, the user community has exploded. Literally hundreds--and perhaps even thousands--of folks follow, comment, and create paleo content on the web every day. The conversation has not only moved, it has expanded into a variety of niches.
In the rest of this post, and the next post, I'll focus on two technologies in particular: social networking and blogs.
Social Networking and the Paleontologist
Over the past year or two, I have found that I get much of my informal news and gossip from Facebook. In fact, Facebook is the primary method of communication that I have with some colleagues, even above email. Facebook is quick, easy, and allows for real-time chat. Over the past few weeks, I learned nearly immediately who had SVP abstracts accepted and rejected, and often get up-to-the-minute reports of manuscript acceptances, fieldwork successes (and failures), and other details from status postings. At its best, Facebook provides a level of casual (sometimes too casual) interaction with many of my far-flung colleagues on a daily basis - a finger on the pulse of the community. The informal nature of Facebook and similar sites mean that, for now, it probably won't replace mailing lists for announcement of new papers or serious discussion. But, social networking sites certainly offer a fun and informative way to keep in touch with other paleo types.
Thoughts? Alternative Perspectives?
Coming up. . .Blogging and the Paleontological Community
Sunday, June 14, 2009
The End of the Internet Mailing List?
No doubt, the internet has changed the way we do paleontology. Email allows faster collaborations among workers at widespread institutions, and sometimes continents. Open access journals and PDFs from "closed access" publications allow virtually instantaneous distribution of peer reviewed research. And, internet mailing lists, forums, social networking sites, and blogs allow a whole new dimension of discussion and dissemination of research results.
The role of the latter venues has had no small level of controversy, ever since their beginnings. Some professionals grumbled over the way any person with an internet connection could flood mailing lists with intellectual garbage. In relatively rare cases, this has happened. Some avocational and non-degreed paleontologists grumbled over real and perceived slights from the "Ivory Tower." This too on occasion has happened, but rather rarely (despite frequent accusations from some quarters). Despite these misgivings, the new modes of scientific communication and discourse are here to stay. But, like all new technologies, the situation is evolving rapidly.
As someone who remembers the days before the Internet, and during the early days of Internet access (for me, beginning around 1997 when the first connections were available at my school), it has been very interesting to follow (and participate in) the trends on-line. In this series of posts, I'll be addressing the past, present, and future of informal electronic communication. This is part of a broader discussion that has been happening throughout the blogosphere recently, particularly at SVP-POW!
The Glory Days of the Internet Mailing List
One of the earliest thrills in my initial exploration of the internet was something called the "Dinosaur Mailing List." Here was a fantastic place where seemingly unfettered discussion of all things dinosaurian took place. New discoveries - including the first inklings of amazing feathered(!) theropods from China - were announced on a seemingly daily basis. Reports from SVP filtered out, and were eagerly read by those of us who couldn't attend the meetings. Acknowledged experts--such as Tom Holtz, Jim Farlow, Darren Tanke, and Ralph Chapman--rubbed elbows and shared discussions with neophytes, fans, and future paleontologists alike. The DML was the place to be for anyone interested in dinosaur paleontology, at any level. You just had to sign up, in order to receive a steady stream of interesting and insightful communications direct to your email inbox.
In the 12 years that I have belonged to the DML, something has changed. The change has been subtle, slow, and creeping, but it has certainly been happening. Fewer professionals are making fewer postings (although many still follow the list). I find myself skipping or deleting 95 percent of the list's messages. Although there are some delightful exceptions, less real scientific discussion is happening here (beyond the perennial topics of the origins of bird flight and theropod systematics). I have seen similar shifts on other mailing lists and internet forums that I belong to, so it is not limited strictly to the DML, nor is it the fault of the hard-working moderaters. What, then, has happened?
Coming Up. . .Shifting Sands of Communication
The role of the latter venues has had no small level of controversy, ever since their beginnings. Some professionals grumbled over the way any person with an internet connection could flood mailing lists with intellectual garbage. In relatively rare cases, this has happened. Some avocational and non-degreed paleontologists grumbled over real and perceived slights from the "Ivory Tower." This too on occasion has happened, but rather rarely (despite frequent accusations from some quarters). Despite these misgivings, the new modes of scientific communication and discourse are here to stay. But, like all new technologies, the situation is evolving rapidly.
As someone who remembers the days before the Internet, and during the early days of Internet access (for me, beginning around 1997 when the first connections were available at my school), it has been very interesting to follow (and participate in) the trends on-line. In this series of posts, I'll be addressing the past, present, and future of informal electronic communication. This is part of a broader discussion that has been happening throughout the blogosphere recently, particularly at SVP-POW!
The Glory Days of the Internet Mailing List
One of the earliest thrills in my initial exploration of the internet was something called the "Dinosaur Mailing List." Here was a fantastic place where seemingly unfettered discussion of all things dinosaurian took place. New discoveries - including the first inklings of amazing feathered(!) theropods from China - were announced on a seemingly daily basis. Reports from SVP filtered out, and were eagerly read by those of us who couldn't attend the meetings. Acknowledged experts--such as Tom Holtz, Jim Farlow, Darren Tanke, and Ralph Chapman--rubbed elbows and shared discussions with neophytes, fans, and future paleontologists alike. The DML was the place to be for anyone interested in dinosaur paleontology, at any level. You just had to sign up, in order to receive a steady stream of interesting and insightful communications direct to your email inbox.
In the 12 years that I have belonged to the DML, something has changed. The change has been subtle, slow, and creeping, but it has certainly been happening. Fewer professionals are making fewer postings (although many still follow the list). I find myself skipping or deleting 95 percent of the list's messages. Although there are some delightful exceptions, less real scientific discussion is happening here (beyond the perennial topics of the origins of bird flight and theropod systematics). I have seen similar shifts on other mailing lists and internet forums that I belong to, so it is not limited strictly to the DML, nor is it the fault of the hard-working moderaters. What, then, has happened?
Coming Up. . .Shifting Sands of Communication
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)