As always, the ratings are based on a combination of journal citations, recent citations, number of articles, and community opinion (outlined previously). At the end of this series, I will post the raw data underlying the ratings.
Don't Forget The Caveats
Remember, these rankings are only one method for measuring the efficacy, quality, and impact of a journal, and you will probably disagree with one or more of the placements on the list. Especially for relatively young journals, rankings may change rapidly in the coming years.
Top Open Access Journals for Paleontology 2009
(General Results, Immediate and Delayed OA)
(General Results, Immediate and Delayed OA)
- Science*
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B
- PLoS Biology
- Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History [tie]
- [tie]
- American Museum Novitates
- Biology Letters
- Ameghiniana
- Paläontologische Zeitschrift
- PLoS ONE
- Palaeontologia Electronica
- Geologica Acta
- Vertebrata PalAsiatica
- Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Geodiversitas [tie]
- [tie]
- Geogaceta
- Estudios Geológicos
- Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology
- Revue de Paléobiologie
- Memoir of the Fukui Prefectural Dinosaur Museum
- Contributions in Science from the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology [tie]
- [tie]
- Journal of Paleontological Sciences*
- Coloquios de Paleontología
- PalArch
- Joannea - Geologie und Paläontologie
- Natura Nascosta
- The Open Paleontology Journal
- Palaeodiversity
- Journal of Paleontological Techniques
Note
It should be noted that some very fine journals (e.g., PaleoBios) have open access archives for older issues (five years or older), but these publications were not included on the general list. I made the somewhat arbitrary decision to exclude journals with lag times of greater than one year.
Up Next. . .Community Rankings of Journals
2 comments:
I think you need to change the title of your chart - it still includes "immediate".
Oops, you're right. Thanks!
Post a Comment