“I think it addresses a niche market for high-end data analysts that want free, readily available code," said Anne H. Milley, director of technology product marketing at SAS. She adds, “We have customers who build engines for aircraft. I am happy they are not using freeware when I get on a jet.”Because everyone knows that commercial software is always reliable. Personally, I don't care what software an engineer uses to design a jet. Just as long as the software and the engineer both know what they're doing. The same goes for the software (a mix of commercial, open source, and free closed-source programs) I use in my own research--I'm not a complete open source zealot (all my FEA analyses are on commercial software, because I still haven't found an open source alternative that doesn't require a computer science degree), but if I can get the job done for free, the price is right!
Thanks to Denim and Tweed for pointing me towards this link.
Nice and interesting blog , i've added on my link-list !!
If you want you can check my modest blog. It is about a personal-paleontology blog.
It is in italian , because it is my mother language !=D
If you like Paleo Blogs, come to my blog: PaleoQuest. It's worth your while.
I work for SAS marketing and want everyone to know that we don't hate R nor do we hate open source. Anne Milley, the source of the SAS quote in the Times, offers a fuller response in her blog post at http://blogs.sas.com/sascom/
Post a Comment